Legal

Comment

Comment by Lady VaJayJay on October 12, 2009 at 9:25pm

Comment by Lady VaJayJay on October 12, 2009 at 9:24pm

DRAG SHOW - LadyVaJayJay & Jizzona Straynger presents " The Ho must go
on!" Join us at Hamburger Mary's in Long Beach this Sunday at 8pm. This
is a 18 and over club. Benefiting OCEC

Comment by Cas on September 8, 2009 at 4:36pm

Don't miss Katherine Darmer, your Legal Chair, speak about the future of LGBT rights in a “post Prop 8 California,” including Marriage Equality and Don't Ask Don't Tell. September 19th 2PM Irvine Ranch Water District 15600 Sand Canyon Ave. (at Waterworks) in Irvine. Sponsored by Americans United for Separation of Church and State
Orange County Chapter

Comment by Dean Inada on August 24, 2009 at 10:25pm

O.C. couple seeking gay marriage has federal suit dismissed

http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/08/24/couple-seeking-gay-marriage-has-federal-suit-dismissed/20429/

Comment by Dean Inada on July 23, 2009 at 1:19pm

Whereas, I understand that immigrant equality is expected to be an issue on the 2010 ballot.
and whereas we expect to have a lot of work to do through and beyond 2012, regardless of what happens in 2010, and whereas we need to be forming coalitions with other people fighting for equality,
therefore I am resolved to be involved in the struggle for immigrant equality,
further, since OCEC legal has been involved in obtaining 501c status for OCEC,
I would therefore like to solicit OCEC legal's assistance for an immigrant rights group that is currently
looking into establishing 501c status.

Comment by Katherine Darmer on July 13, 2009 at 11:16pm

Click on "latest news" on the main page for news of the federal marriage lawsuit

Comment by Katherine Darmer on June 8, 2009 at 6:02pm

I agree with Eric. given the 6-1 decision, there is virtually no chance the rehearing will be granted.

Comment by Eric Kibel on June 8, 2009 at 5:56pm

Dean,

Someone filed a petition for rehearing, asking the California Supreme Court to reconsider its recent Prop 8 ruling. It is a routine procedural request that is often made and rarely granted. I don't know the basis of the request, or the party that filed it, but I seriously doubt the 6-1 court is going to rehear this case. The next opportunity for change on Prop 8 will likely come from the federal court case filed by David Boies and Ted Olson or from the 2010 election.

Comment by Dean Inada on June 8, 2009 at 5:45pm

What does this mean?

the following transaction has occurred in:
STRAUSS v. HORTON
Case: S168047, Supreme Court of California

Date (YYYY-MM-DD): 2009-06-05
Event Description: Rehearing petition filed
For more information on this case, go to:
http://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/dockets.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=1899725

Comment by Minerva Figueroa on April 10, 2009 at 5:33pm

Oops I am sorry I misspelled your name.

• First
• Previous
• Next
• Last